NEWS December 13 2020

Recent Amendments to the ICC Arbitration Rules

By Justin Alexander Gambino, Senior Associate


The International Chamber of Commerce (the “ICC”) has officially released its amendments to the ICC Arbitration Rules 2017, which will apply to arbitrations commenced on or after 1 January 2021. As explained by the ICC itself, the amendments are designed to “reflect the established practice of the Court [of Arbitration]”, whereas others strive to increase “the flexibility, efficiency and transparency of ICC Arbitrations1.  

The 2021 amendments introduce a number of important changes to the 2017 Arbitration Rules. Some of the most relevant changes are outlined below. 

Joinder of Additional Parties
The amended version of Article 7 of the Arbitration Rules gives arbitrators greater guidance regarding requests for the joinder of third parties. Under Article 7(5), any request for joinder made after appointment or confirmation of any arbitrator shall be decided once the arbitral tribunal has been constituted. The additional party must, however, accept the constitution of the arbitral tribunal and consent to the Terms of Reference. Article 7(5) further specifies that the arbitrators shall consider “all relevant circumstances”, which may include:

1.    whether the arbitral tribunal has prima facie jurisdiction over the additional party:

2.    the timing of the Request for Joinder; 

3.    possible conflicts of interests; and 

4.    the impact of the joinder on the arbitral procedure. 

In any event, Article 7(5) cautions that acceptance of a joinder request is without prejudice to the arbitral tribunal’s decision concerning its jurisdiction over the additional party. 

Consolidation of Arbitrations
The ICC has also revised the wording of Article 10.  Although the amendments to the text themselves are minor, the legal implications are significant. The revised wording of Article 10(b) has expanded the circumstances in which the Court of Arbitration may now consolidate (upon party request) multiple arbitrations into a single arbitration, including where the claims in the arbitration are made under the same arbitration agreement “or agreements”. The previous wording of Article 10(b) only expressly allowed for consolidation in the event of a single arbitration agreement. 

Third-Party Funding 
Article 11 has been amended to include a provision for third-party funding, which has become a common phenomenon in modern arbitration practice. The amended version of Article 11 provides under sub-section (7) that the parties “must promptly inform” the ICC Secretariat, the arbitrators and the other parties “of the existence and identity of any non-party which has entered into an arrangement for the funding of claims or defences and under which it has an economic interest in the outcome of the arbitration”. The underlying purpose of this amendment is to assist the arbitrators when evaluating whether they are sufficiently independent and impartial to serve on the arbitral tribunal. 

Constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal
The amended wording of Article 12 now empowers the Court of Arbitration to appoint each member of a three-member arbitral tribunal, notwithstanding any agreement by the parties on the method of its constitution. Such discretion may only be exercised “in exceptional circumstances […] to avoid a significant risk of unequal treatment and unfairness that may affect the validity of the award”. 

Party Representation 
Article 17 has been heavily reworded to account for conflicts of interests concerning the arbitrators following a change in representation by one of the parties. Under Article 17(2), the arbitral tribunal now has the discretion to “take any measure necessary to avoid a conflict of interest of an arbitrator arising from a change in party representation”. This includes “the exclusion of new party representatives from participating” in the arbitral proceedings.

The Court of Arbitration has also expanded an arbitral tribunal’s authority with regards to hearings. Under Article 26(1), arbitrators may decide to call for a hearing, regardless of whether this is upon request of either party. More importantly, the arbitrators may – after having consulted with the parties – determine the modality of the hearing in light of the facts and circumstances of the case. The arbitrators may instruct that the hearing take place in person or, alternatively, “by videoconference, telephone or other appropriate means of communication”. Although the Court of Arbitration had previously encouraged parties to conduct hearings virtually in light of the Covid-19 pandemic with the “ICC Guidance Note on Possible Measures Aimed at Mitigating the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic” issued in April 2020, the amended rules now expressly give an arbitral tribunal the power to do so.

A comprehensive mark-up of the amendments introduced by the Court of Arbitration of the Arbitration Rules can be accessed here:   

You might also be interested in...
NEWS November 02 2020
Financing An International Trade
NEWS October 04 2020
DIFC’s Data Protection Law
NEWS June 30 2020
Public Prosecution in Dubai
NEWS June 22 2020
Covid-19 & Force Majeure
NEWS June 15 2020
Use of Electronic Signatures
NEWS May 04 2020
Piercing the Corporate Veil
NEWS January 16 2020
Bona Fide Principle Prevails
NEWS September 04 2018
Franchising in the UAE
NEWS November 14 2018
Extradition Requests in the UAE
NEWS April 24 2018
Bankruptcy in the UAE
NEWS February 07 2018
Seminar: UAE Civil Procedures Law
NEWS March 19 2018
Recent Developments at the RDC
NEWS August 01 2018
Charities and Endowments in Dubai
NEWS September 17 2017
Our Litigation Team Award Winners
NEWS December 05 2022
Interest on Late Payments in the UAE
NEWS February 07 2024
Abu Dhabi Welcomes arbitrateAD

For better web experience, please use the website in portrait mode